Friday, January 27, 2012

"Crippling sanctions": crippling for whom?

If you watched the State of the Union address the other night, you may have heard Nobel Peace Prize winner Barack Obama talk about imposing "crippling sanctions" on Iran. It's a common phrase that the interchangeable Republican candidates (except one, of course) regularly utter as well.

When we impose economic sanctions restricting the flow of goods to and from a country, the government of that country simply does what government always does: it hoards everything for itself at the expense of the people. It then has an easy scapegoat upon which to blame the suffering of the people, which in turn makes those people hate that scapegoat, naturally. So, not only do we not punish the government we are seeking to punish (as if we had the authority to do so in the first place), we also create enemies of its people, instead of winning their hearts and minds through our values, culture, and commerce.

Let's just be honest about this: imposing "crippling sanctions" on any sovereign nation is antithetical to the declared American values of natural rights, liberty and peaceful exchange; leads to untold death and destruction; and makes us less safe. Quite contrary to the Republican/Democrat/Media establishment’s endless war agenda, Thomas Jefferson encouraged the following:

“Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations—entangling alliances with none.”

We are kidding ourselves if we believe that the U.S. government imposing sanctions on any country is legally, logically or morally justifiable, and does something other than kill large numbers of innocent civilians and lead directly to war.  In fact, if this were done to our country, we would correctly consider it an act of war. 

Crippling, indeed.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Endorsements for some of Ron Paul's positions, round 2

For Round 1, go here

On his opposition to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA):
"The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home." - James Madison

On his insistence that people own their bodies and government has no authority to dictate what they ingest:
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis

On a foreign policy focused on peace and The Golden Rule:
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God." - Jesus Christ

On natural rights and civil liberties:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." - The Declaration of Independence 

Endorsements for some of Ron Paul's positions

On foreign policy:
"Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations--entangling alliances with none." - Thomas Jefferson

On the PATRIOT Act, NDAA, etc. (a.k.a. shredding the Bill of Rights in the name of "safety"):
"They who would give up essential liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin


On the nanny state (i.e. War on Drugs, etc.):
"I don't believe in a government that protects us from ourselves." - Ronald Reagan

On the inherent danger of the permanent warfare state:
"Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is perhaps the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other." - James Madison

On everything:
The Constitution (the whole thing)

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

The false choice of Republican vs. Democrat

...and right vs. left, conservative vs. liberal, etc.

We have been deceived.

How is it that so-called conservative George W. Bush doubled the national debt, doubled the deficit, massively expanded the federal government at all levels, created a new unfunded socialized medicine entitlement, "abandoned free market principles to save the free market system" via government bailouts (his own words), and knowingly and blatantly violated the U.S. Constitution in numerous severe ways?

How is it that so-called liberal Barack Obama increased the military footprint all over the world, increased the drone strikes on multiple countries—killing countless civilians in the process, launched new overt and covert wars, violated civil liberties on an unprecedented scale, ratcheted up the federal government’s war on personal behavior, and gave massive bailouts and handouts to favored corporations?

How is it that this alleged political struggle seems to have resulted in an amalgamation of the worst of both sides?

The answer is that Republican vs. Democrat is a false choice. There is only one party: the big government party. It loves both warfare and welfare, and sees both as a means to power and control. It detests freedom, and tramples both personal and economic liberty. It steals from both the rich and the poor to benefit itself, whether through taxation or inflation.

We are being lied to. But we do have a real choice, with precisely two options:
1) an eventual complete economic collapse--offered by the establishment; or
2) a complete rejection of the establishment--offered by Ron Paul--and the resulting liberty, peace and prosperity

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

The means of defense

“The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home.” - James Madison, 1787

“And when they say, ‘I want my lawyer,’ you tell them, ‘Shut up. You don’t get a lawyer.’" - Lindsey Graham, 2011




Tuesday, January 17, 2012

"Boo" to the Golden Rule? WTF?

The video below highlights something for which I am sincerely grateful to Ron Paul. He taught me to truly view all people as individual's with natural, unalienable rights. Not only my neighbors and peers, not only all Americans who are fortunate enough to live under the U.S. Constitution (whatever shred of it remains), but "all men" (and women) as laid out definitively in the Declaration of Independence.

In the video, some in the crowd at the South Carolina debate Monday night boo Ron Paul for suggesting that we apply the Golden Rule in our dealings with other countries. 


Yes, the Golden Rule...you know, that radical and controversial philosophy that says that we should treat others the way we’d want to be treated. The rule might suggest, among other things, that we not carry out regular drone strikes inside other countries which result in the death of innocent civilians, or that we not invade and occupy sovereign nations for years on end, or that we not prop up brutal dictators that serve our interests in certain countries while using covert operations to overthrow uncooperative governments in others.

Ron Paul dares to suggest that this behavior on the part of our government might, just might, cause resentment and anger in those unfortunate enough to find themselves among the collateral damage of U.S. foreign policy.

Nonsense! How naive! How isolationist! How unpatriotic! Boooooooo!

Ok, seriously, what could possibly be boo-worthy about this?

Without this respect of innocent life, of individual liberty, and of the natural and unalienable rights of all people, this country is doomed. And no amount of military power and might will be able save it. 

God help us when one day we find ourselves at the mercy of a superpower that flouts the Golden Rule.


Thursday, January 12, 2012

Jon Stewart steps in as the voice of sanity in a sea of cable "news" hacks (yet again)

Go to 2:45 in the clip linked below:

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-january-11-2012/indecision-2012---new-hampshire-primary-results?xrs=share_copy

Oh, Larry. You just can't accept the fact that establishment hacks like you and most of the rest of cable "news" (Fox, MSNBC and CNN alike) are becoming increasingly irrelevant, as young people vote in droves for the very man whom you all ignore and/or tell us we shouldn't vote for.



Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Establishment says, "ONLY Romney can beat Obama! (wash, rinse, repeat)"

"Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, run neck-and-neck with President Obama in a general-election matchup, according to a new CBS News poll released late on Monday that shows the two front-runners in Tuesday's New Hampshire GOP primary running stronger against the president than their fellow Republicans."


http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/poll-romney-paul-tie-obama-20120109

We need government R&D!


Monday, January 9, 2012

Same propaganda, different day. (And slightly different spelling.)

Iraq. Iran. It must be cost effective to use the same script and simply change the "q" to "n".


Ron Paul gets the most in donations from the military. Overwhelmingly.


"Paul received at least $95,567 from military donors between January and September of last year, the most recent data available, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. That’s nearly seven times what Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, who edged out Paul in Iowa, collected from military donors combined."


Sunday, January 8, 2012

A serious threat to racism and inequality

Ron Paul is the only one among the presidential candidates for 2012, including Barack Obama, with the courage and integrity to talk about the most devastating sources of racism and inequality today: the federal "War on Drugs", the judicial system and the unnecessary foreign wars.



Ron Paul vs. chickenhawk Newt Gingrich

Don't miss the section from 2:20 to 3:30